PRINT
RSS
URL
Copy and paste the url below:
PDF
Sitemap
2.1. English Law
Introductory note
2.US.1 Restatement of the law of restitution (1937, American Law Institute)
2.E.2 House of Lords, Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd. the Gambling solicitor
2.US.1 Restatement of the law of restitution (1937, American Law Institute)
2.E.2 House of Lords, Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd. the Gambling solicitor
2.2. French Law
2.2.1. Introduction
2.2.1.A. No General Legislative Provision
2.2.1.B. Antecedents of The Modern Law
Gestion d'affaires
The action de in rem verso
The action de in rem verso
2.2.1.C. The Foundation of The Modern Law - The Boudier Case
Absorption into quasi-contracts
2.2.2. Materials
2.F.3 Cass Req, 15 June 1892
2.3. German Law
2.3.1. Introduction
2.3.1.A. The Restitutionary Obligations in the BGB
Restitution in the owner-possessor relationship
Restitution following the termination of the contract owing to repudiation
Restitution according to the law on unjust enrichment
Other restitutionary obligations
Restitution following the termination of the contract owing to repudiation
Restitution according to the law on unjust enrichment
Other restitutionary obligations
2.3.1.B. Obligations Relating to The Reimbursement for Outlays
2.3.1.C. Enrichment Law According to §§ 812 SQQ.
2.3.2. Materials
2.G.4 BS Markesinis, W Lorenz and G Danneman, The Law of Contracts and Restitution: a Comparative Introduction
2.G.5 E v Caemmerer, "Ungerechtfertigte Bereicherung und unerlaubte Handlung"
2.G.6 BGH, 12 July 1996. the House of Sylt
2.G.5 E v Caemmerer, "Ungerechtfertigte Bereicherung und unerlaubte Handlung"
2.G.6 BGH, 12 July 1996. the House of Sylt
2.4. Dutch Law
2.NL.7 EJH Schrage, "Unjustified Enrichment"
2.NL.8 MH Bregstein, Seven specific cases
2.NL.9 Hoge Raad, 30 January 1959. one General Remedy or a Limited Number of Specific Remedies
2.NL.8 MH Bregstein, Seven specific cases
2.NL.9 Hoge Raad, 30 January 1959. one General Remedy or a Limited Number of Specific Remedies
2.5. Scots Law
2.5.1 Introduction
No general legislative provision
Nomenclature
General action or specific remedies?
Nomenclature
General action or specific remedies?
2.5.2. Materials
2.5.2.A. General Principle and Taxanomy
2.SC.10 WDH Sellar, "Unjust enrichment"
2.SC.11 Stair, Institutions
2.SC.12 Stair, Institutions
2.SC.13 Bankton, Institutions of the law of Scotland
2.SC.14 Prescription and Limitation Act 1973
2.SC.15 HL MacQueen, Payment of another's debt
2.SC.16 R Evans-Jones and P Hellewege, Some observations on the taxonomy of unjustified enrichment in Scots law
2.SC.17 WDH Sellar, "Unjust Enrichment"
2.SC.18 WDH Sellar, Shilliday v Smith: unjust enrichment through the looking glass
2.SC.19 Court of Session (Inner House), Watson v Shankland. the charterparty which failed
2.SC.20 Court of Session (Inner House), Morgan Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Lothian Regional Council. the "swaps" case
2.SC.21 Court of Session (Inner House), Shilliday v Smith. the disappointed co-habitee
2.SC.22 House of Lords, Dollar Land (Cumbernauld) Ltd v CIN Properties Ltd. the irritated lease
2.5.2.B "marks" or "notes" of recompense
2.SC.23 WHD Sellar, "Unjust enrichment"
2.SC.24 A Rodger, "Unjustified Enrichment"
2.SC.25 WHD Sellar, "Unjust Enrichment"
2.SC.26 N Whitty, The Taxonomy of Unjust Enrichment in Scots law
2.SC.27 Court of Session (Inner House), Edinburgh and District Tramways Co Ltd v Courtenay. the Edinburgh Tramcar
2.SC.28 Court of Session (Inner House), Varney (Scotland) Ltd v Burgh of Lanark. the burgh sewers
2.SC.29 Court of Session (Inner House), Lawrence Building Co Ltd v Lanark County Council. the council sewers
2.SC.11 Stair, Institutions
2.SC.12 Stair, Institutions
2.SC.13 Bankton, Institutions of the law of Scotland
2.SC.14 Prescription and Limitation Act 1973
2.SC.15 HL MacQueen, Payment of another's debt
2.SC.16 R Evans-Jones and P Hellewege, Some observations on the taxonomy of unjustified enrichment in Scots law
2.SC.17 WDH Sellar, "Unjust Enrichment"
2.SC.18 WDH Sellar, Shilliday v Smith: unjust enrichment through the looking glass
2.SC.19 Court of Session (Inner House), Watson v Shankland. the charterparty which failed
2.SC.20 Court of Session (Inner House), Morgan Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Lothian Regional Council. the "swaps" case
2.SC.21 Court of Session (Inner House), Shilliday v Smith. the disappointed co-habitee
2.SC.22 House of Lords, Dollar Land (Cumbernauld) Ltd v CIN Properties Ltd. the irritated lease
2.5.2.B "marks" or "notes" of recompense
2.SC.23 WHD Sellar, "Unjust enrichment"
2.SC.24 A Rodger, "Unjustified Enrichment"
2.SC.25 WHD Sellar, "Unjust Enrichment"
2.SC.26 N Whitty, The Taxonomy of Unjust Enrichment in Scots law
2.SC.27 Court of Session (Inner House), Edinburgh and District Tramways Co Ltd v Courtenay. the Edinburgh Tramcar
2.SC.28 Court of Session (Inner House), Varney (Scotland) Ltd v Burgh of Lanark. the burgh sewers
2.SC.29 Court of Session (Inner House), Lawrence Building Co Ltd v Lanark County Council. the council sewers
2.6. South African Law
Introductory note
2.SA.30 D Visser, "Unjustified Enrichment"
2.SA.31 Supreme Court of Appeal, McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC. McCarthy Retail
2.SA.32 Supreme Court of Appeal, Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste v Willers. the Willers case
2.SA.30 D Visser, "Unjustified Enrichment"
2.SA.31 Supreme Court of Appeal, McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC. McCarthy Retail
2.SA.32 Supreme Court of Appeal, Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste v Willers. the Willers case
