Along came a spider...

6.1. Introduction

6.1.1. The Duty to Make a Reasonable Accomodation—Theoretical Background

6.1.2. Reasonable Accomodation and The Non-Discrimination Requirement

6.1.3. Goals of This Chapter

6.2. The Meaning of The Term “Reasonable Accomodation”

6.2.1. The Meaning of The Term “Reasonable”

6.2.1.A. An Accomodation that does Not Result in Excessive Difficulties for The Employer

6.FI.2. Finnish Non-Discrimination Act 21/2004
6.FI.3. Extracts from the Preparatory Works to the Finnish
6.IE.4. Irish Equal Status Act 2000
6.IE.5. Irish Employment Equality Act 1998
6.IE.6. Labour Court, 23 January 2000, A Company (represented by the Irish Business and Employers’ Confederation) v A Worker (represented by Irish Municipal, Public and Civil Trade Union). failure to do all that is reasonable to accommodate an employee – failure to reassign tasks and provide parking space
6.IE.7. Equality Tribunal, 4 February 2002, An Employee (represented by IMPACT) v A Local Authority. Failure to do all that is reasonable to accommodate an employee – failure to follow expert advice
6.IE.8. Equality Tribunal, 1 August 2000, Mr John Roche v Alabaster Associates Limited t/a Madigans. refusal to allow access to a restaurant of a guide dog amounts to a failure to provide reasonable accommodation
6.BE.9. Belgian Act of 25 February 2003 to Combat Discrimination and to Amend the Act of 15 February 1993 to Establish a Centre for Equal Opportunity and to Combat Racism
6.BE.10. Belgian Guide to... Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with a Disability at Work, March 2005
6.DE.11. German Social Law Code, Book Nine, Rehabilitation and Participation of disabled persons
6.US.12. Americans with Disabilities Act
6.US.13. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Regulations on the ADA
6.US.14. 7th Circuit 1995, 44 F 3d 538, Vande Zande v State of Wisconsin Department of Administration. No failure to make a reasonable accommodation not allowing an employee to work full time at home and by not adapting kitchen
6.US.15. Supreme Court of the United States, 2002 535 US 391, US Airways, Inc v Barnett. An accommodation which conflicts with a seniority rule will generally not be reasonable

6.2.1.B. An Accomodation that is Effective

A Reasonable Accomodation With Regard to Religous Practices

6.2.1.C. Both an Accomodation which does Not Result in Excessive Difficulties for The Employer and an “Effective Accomodation”

The Employment Equality Directive
Legislative Provisions in EU Member States Based on Article 5 of The Framework Directive
United Kingdom

6.2.1.D. Comparative Overview

6.2.2. The Meaning of The Term “Accomodation” and The Kinds of Accomodations that are Required

6.2.2.A. General Classifications of Accomodation

Employment -Related Accomodations —“Hard” and “Soft” Costs
6.US.26. MA Stein, The Law and Economics of Disability Accommodations
Stage Within The Employment Process
Characteristics of Beneficiaries

6.2.2.B. Terminology

6.2.2.C. The Qualities Required for any Accomodation

6.2.2.D. The Kinds of Accomodations which are Required

Statutory Provisions
United Kingdom
Ireland
Guidelines Accompanying Legislation
United Kingdom
Belgium
6.BE.35. Belgian Guide to... Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with a Disability at Work, March 2005
Guidelines Related to Accomodating Religious Practices — US and UK
Examples From Case-Law - Transfer of Employee to Another Position

6.2.2.E. Choice as to The Approriate Accomodation

6.2.2.F. Comparative Overview

6.3. Entitlement to Claim a Reasonable Accomodation and Obligations on Both Parties

6.3.1. The Generic Categories

6.3.1.A. People with Disabilities

6.3.1.B. Members of Religious Minorities and Individuals Wishing to Manifest Their Religion

6.3.1.C. Other Groups

6.3.2. Specific Requirements — People with Disabilities

6.3.2.A. Employment

Person with Disability Must be Qualified for The Job/Employment - Related Activities
Employment Equality Directive
Ireland
The Netherlands
The Obligation on The Person with a Disability to Inform The Employer
United Kingdom
The Netherlands
Latvia
The Obligation on The Employer to Consider and Identify a Reasonable Accomodation
United Kingdom
Ireland

6.3.2.B. Services

Impossible or Unreasonably Difficult to Access Services
United Kingdom
6.UK.55. BJ Doyle, Disability Discrimination, Law and Practice
6.UK.56. C Gooding and C Casserley, Disability Discrimination Laws and Goods and Services
A Reactive Duty Owed to Individuals or an Anticipatory Duty Owed to The Group of People with Disabilities?
United Kingdom
6.GB.57. Code of Practice – Rights of access: services to public, public authority functions, private clubs and premises
6.UK.58. C Gooding and C Casserley, Disability Discrimination Laws and Goods and Services

6.3.3. Specific Requirements — Religion

6.3.3.A. An Individual may Need to Prove that They are of a Particular Faith

6.3.4. Comparative Overview

6.4. Limitations on the Duty to Accomodate

6.4.1. Introduction and Exploration of The Issues

6.4.2. National Legislative Provisions

6.4.2.A. Financial Considerations

6.BG.62. Bulgarian Protection Against Discrimination Act (effective as of 1 January 2004)
6.BE.63. Belgian Guide to... Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with a Disability at Work, March 2005

6.4.2.B. Ireland — Financial Issues and the Impact of The Employment Equality Directive

6.4.2.C. Non-Financial Issues which Justify a Failure to make Accomodation

6.4.3. Comparative Overview

6.5. Fitting The Duty to Accomodate into The Non-Discrimination Framework

6.5.1. Failure to Make a Reasonable Accomodation as a Form of Direct Discrimination

6.5.2. Failure to Make a Reasonable Accomodation as a Form of Indirect Discrimination

6.5.3. Failure to Make a Reasonable Accomodation as a Sui Generis Form of Discrimination

6.5.4. Failure to Elaborate on The Status of an Unjustified Failure to Make a Reasonable Accomodation

6.5.5. Comparative Overview

6.6. Reasonable Accomodation and Positive Action

6.6.1. Introduction and Exploration of The Issues

6.6.2. A Clear Separation of Reasonable Accomodation From Positive Action

6.6.3. Ambiguity or Confusion

6.6.4. Reasonable Accomodation as an Exception to the Principle of Equal Treatment

6.6.5. Reasonable Accomodation Labelled as a Form of Positive Action

6.6.6. Comparative Overview

6.7. Comparative Analysis