Along came a spider...

1.1. The Notion of Contract

1.1.1. Definitions

1.1.1.A. Definition of Contract under Certain Systems of Law

1.F.1. Article 1101 Code civil
1.I.2. Article 1321 Codice civile
1.NL.3. Article 6:213 Burgerlijk Wetboek
1.G.4. §305 BGB
Second Restatement on Contracts

1.1.1.B. Contract and Gift

1.1.1.C. Contract and Undertaking by Unilateral Promise

1.1.2. Place and Sources of Contract Law

1.1.2.A. French Law

1.1.2.B. German Law

1.G.11. Contents of BGB

1.1.2.C. English Law

1.E.12. House of Lords, Moschi v Lep Air Services Ltd

1.1.3. Categories of Contract

1.1.3.A. The Synallagmatic or Bilateral Contract and the Unilateral Contract

1.NL.13A. Article 6:261 BW
1.E.14. Court of Appeal, United Dominions Trust Ltd v Eagle Aircraft Services Ltd. recourse agreement

1.1.3.B. Contract for Valuable Consideration (A titre onéreux) and Contract without Valuable Consideration (a titre gratuit) or Charitable Contract

1.E.15. Court of Appeal, Crabb v Arun District Council. a land-lockedproperty

1.1.3.C. Contracts Giving Rise to Obligations and Contracts Transferringor Creating Property Rights

1.1.3.D. Consumer Contracts

1.1.4. Specific Peculiarities

1.1.4.A. German Law: The Principle of Separability (Abstraktionsprinzip)

1.G.26 K Zweigert and H Kötz, Introduction to Comparative Law
1.G.27 RG, 25 June 1925. transfer of property to mistress

1.1.4.B. French Law: The Administrative Contract

1.F.28. Conseil d'Etat, 31 July 1912, Société des Granits Porphyroides des Vosges. paving stones
1.F.29. Conseil d'Etat, 20 April 1956, Epoux Bertin. contract to feed refugees
1.E.30. Contract Law Today

1.1.4.C. English Law: Bailment

1.E.31. Court of Appeal, Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd. the stolenmink stole

1.2. The Scope of Contract

1.2.1. Contract and Tort

1.2.1.A. The Respective Domains

1.F.32. Cass civ 1re, 7 March 1989. icy platform
1.G.33. RGH, 7 December 1911. falling rolls of lino
1.F.34. Cass civ 1re, 7 November 1961. a fatal fall
1.E.35. Court of Appeal, Ward v Tesco Stores Ltd. spilt yoghurt
1.F.36. Cass civ, 6 December 1932. fatal fall from train (I)
1.F.37. Cass civ, 24 May 1933. fatal fall from train (II): the sister
1.F.38. Cass civ 2e, 23 January 1959. drowning caused by negligence
1.F.39. Cass ass plén, 7 February 1986. insulation not fit for purpose 45
1.F.40. Cass ass plén, 12 July 1991. bad plumbing
1.E.41 Court of Appeal, Simaan General Contracting Co v Pilkington Glass(No 2). red glass
1.E.42. House of Lords, Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co Ltd. defective floor laid by sub-contractor
1.E.43. House of Lords, Murphy v Brentwood District Council. inadequate foundations
1.E.44 King's Bench Division, Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd. paint for a pier
1.E.45. Privy Council, New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v AM Satterthwaite&Co Ltd. himalaya clause
1.G.46. BGH, 17 January 1985. non-payment by charterer
1.G.47. BGH, 26 November 1986. tax consultant's "rosy view"
1.G.48. BGH, 28 June 1979. isolar glass
1.G.49. BGH, 13 December 1973. direct invoices

1.2.1.B. The Interests to be Weighed on Deciding Whether to Bring an Action in Contract or in Tort

1.2.2. Contract and Restitution (Quasi-Contract)

1.F.55. Article 1371 Code civil
1.G.56. §812 BGB
1.NL.57. Article 6:212 BW
1.F.58. Cass civ, 28 February 1939. lingerie not paid for
1.F.59. Cass civ, 2 March 1915. work on baths
1.G.60. OLG Hamm, 9 January 1974. car repairs ordered by husband ofowner
1.E.61. Queen's Bench Division, British Steel Corporation v ClevelandBridge and Engineering Co Ltd. steel nodes
1.E.62. Court of Appeal, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale vIslington London Borough Council. swaps contract

1.3. Binding Nature of Contractual Obligations

1.E.63. D Harris and D Tallon (eds), Contract Law Today
OW Holmes, Collected Legal Papers

1.3.1. Intention to Create Legal Relations

1.3.1.A. Intention to Enter into a Contract

1.F.64. Cass civ 1re, 6 April 1994. shared business trip
1.E.65. House of Lords, Albert v Motor Insurers Bureau. shared lifts in car
1.G.66. BGH, 16 May 1974. betting syndicate
1.E.67. Queen's Bench Division, Simpkins v Pays. competition in Sunday paper
1.E.68. Court of Appeal, Balfour v Balfour. allowance to wife

1.3.1.B. Agreement in Honour, "Gentlemen's" Agreement

1.E.69. Court of Appeal and House of Lords, Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton Bros. "binding in honour only"
1.G.70. BGH , 22 January 1964. priority treatment
1.F.71. Cass civ 2e, 27 November 1985. alimony agreement

1.3.1.C. Letters of Intent, of Patronage or of Comfort

1.E.72. Court of Appeal, Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp Bhd. comfort letter
1.G.73. BGH, 30 November 1992. letter of patronage
1.F.74. Cass com, 21 December 1987. french letter of comfort

1.3.1.D. Agreement in Principle (Accord de Principe)

1.F.75. Cass com, 4 February 1986. maize driers
1.F.76. Cass soc, 24 March 1958. agreement to consider re-employment
1.G.77. BGH, 8 June 1962. consulting his lawyer
1.E.78. Court of Appeal, Eccles v Bryant. "subject to contract"

1.3.2. Foundations of The Binding Force of Contract

1.3.2.A. General

1.G.79. H Kötz, European Contract Law
1.F.80. Carbonnier

1.3.2.B. Historical Background

1.F.81. Articles 6 and 1134 French Civil Code
1.F.82. Terré, Simmler and Lequette

1.3.2.C. The Theory of Reliance

1.G.83. Cohen, The Basis of Contract
1.E.84. P Atiyah, Promises, Obligations and the Law of Contract

1.3.2.D. Applications

1.NL.85. Articles 3.33 and 3.35 BW
1.E.86. The House of Lords, The Hannah Blumenthal. abandonment of arbitration agreement
1.F.87. Cass civ 3e, 8 April 1987. rent not claimed

1.3.3. Cause (Other than Unlafful Cause) and Consideration

1.3.3.A. French Law: The Doctrine of Cause

1.3.3.B. English Law: Consideration

1.E.101. Currie v Misa, Thomas v Thomas, F Pollock, Principles of Contract, Dunlop v Selfridge
1.US.102. 2nd Restatement on Contracts, s 71
1.E.103. Court of Appeal, Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. the Smoke Ball
1.E.104. House of Lords, Foakes v Beer. debt paid without interest due
1.E.105. Privy Council, Pao On v Lau Yiu Long. the share deal
1.E.106. Queen's Bench Division, Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd. the High Trees case

1.3.3.C. German Law: neither Cause nor Consideration

1.G.107. §812 BGB

1.3.4. Formal Requirements

1.G.108. R Ihering, Geist des römischen Rechts

1.3.4.A. German Law: Moderate Formalism, Freedom as to Proof

1.3.4.B. English Law: Limited Formalism; Rule of Almost Unrestricted Production of Evidence

1.E.114. Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s 1
1.E.115. Statute of Frauds 1677, s 4

1.3.4.C. French Law: A Certain Formalism, Means of Proof Legally Circumscribed

1.3.4.D. Conclusion